Jonathan Turley, a law professor at Georgetown University, shared his thoughts on Hunter Biden’s recent conviction following the jury’s decision. Turley suggested that this may only be the beginning of legal troubles for the President’s son. Hunter was found guilty on three felony charges related to the purchase of a .38-caliber revolver in 2018, following a brief deliberation by the jurors. Turley also mentioned that there is still an ongoing criminal referral for perjury from the House of Representatives, as well as a pending tax case against Joe Biden’s son.

“His counsel has got to refocus on that tax case. They are going into that case now with a convicted felon,” Turley told Fox News “Faulkner Focus” host Harris Faulkner. “Now, these are very different types of claims, but there is a third front developing. Congress just referred, what I consider to be a very strong case, for a perjury investigation of Hunter Biden after his testimony before Congress.”

“Now the expectation is that Garland is going to basically scuttle that referral, but the problem is that the House seems to have Hunter Biden dead [to] rights… on those perjury claims,” Turley added. “It is hard to see how what he said before Congress was true. It is a much more serious offense. It is currently sitting on the desk of Merrick Garland.”

Watch:

He proceeded to mention that the tax case entailed potentially “significantly more grave” accusations, which included connections to the business transactions of the Biden family. Previously, Turley remarked that the attempt made by Hunter Biden’s lawyers to seek “nullification” of the felony charges was “overwhelmed” by the jurors.

“This was a very fair judge in my view, uh, she ruled for the defense and for the prosecutors on different issues. She went right down the middle of the road, and I think in the end, justice was done here,” Turley said of U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika of the District of Delaware after Faulkner contrasted her handling of the Biden case with New York Judge Juan Merchan’s handling of Trump’s business documents case. “This jury was able to overcome a nullification strategy.”

“Part of the problem was that Abbe Lowell, the defense attorney, put forward a bunch of defenses in the opening statement that collapsed within 48 hours,” Turley added. “I mean, the prosecutors did an extraordinarily good job here. They were focused, they were disciplined, and they methodically took apart each of these defenses in front of the jury and when you pursue nullification strategy, it can go too far sometimes. It can make the jury feel like they are being treated as chumps and I think that here, the jury followed instructions and did their duty.”

Watch: